Learn more. Subscribe today!

Organizations to Congress: Quit Playing Politics and Deal to Prevent Iran War

posted Press Release from NIAC (National Iranian American Council) for Payvand Iran News

Washington, DC - The National Iranian American Council (NIAC) was one of 37 organizations to send a letter to Congress today regarding the roles of Congress and the President in sealing a nuclear deal with Iran. The letter was prompted when certain lawmakers reacted harshly to a New York Times report that, if there is a nuclear deal with Iran, the White House plans to initially use executive action to temporarily suspend certain sanctions.

“The lawmakers pretending to be shocked are the ones who never had any intention of trading in sanctions to get a peaceful nuclear deal,” said NIAC Policy Director Jamal Abdi. “They wanted to use sanctions to either make the standoff with Iran permanent, as with Cuba, or start a catastrophic war, as with Iraq.”

Congress has consistently provided the necessary authority for the President to temporarily suspend sanctions on Iran as necessary. Yet some of the Republican authors of the sanctions bills, including Mark Kirk and Ileana Ros Lehtinen, have been the most vocal critics of the President’s plan to use those authorities.

“If Iran upholds its commitments and the deal is working, Congress would need to authorize permanent sanctions relief,” said Abdi. “But some lawmakers simply do not want any peaceful deal and are grasping at straws to try to prevent it.”

You can view the letter below or as a PDF.

October 23, 2014

United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510

House of Representatives
Washington, D.C. 20515

Dear United States Senators and Members of the House of Representatives:

We are organizations representing millions of Americans advocating in support of diplomacy to secure an agreement which ensures that Iran never acquires a nuclear weapon. We write to express deep concern with inaccurate and counterproductive rhetoric from a handful of Members of Congress regarding possible outcomes of the current negotiations.

Particularly irresponsible are threats to oppose any comprehensive agreement limiting Iran’s nuclear program that initially suspends US sanctions on Iran through lawful executive action. Congress’ authorization of the President’s power to suspend and re-impose US sanctions on Iran is clear and unmistakable in each piece of legislation it has passed on the subject. Use of these provisions by the President to implement the initial phase of an agreement that ensures Iran does not acquire a nuclear weapon would reflect an affirmation, not a subversion, of Congress’ will.

Suspending select sanctions on Iran - in the manner authorized by Congress - in the early stages of implementing such an agreement would allow the administration to immediately snap these measures back into place in the event of non-compliance by Iran. We agree with the administration’s view that, beyond the essential consultation role played by Congress throughout the present negotiations, it will ultimately fall to Congress to authorize any permanent sanctions relief under an agreement. This is the best arrangement for the United States to uphold its terms under an agreement while ensuring that permanent sanctions relief is conditioned on Iran’s compliance with its own obligations.

Separately, we are disappointed to hear some Members of Congress also threaten to oppose any agreement that does not completely “eliminate” or “dismantle” Iran’s uranium enrichment infrastructure. It is troubling that these members would fail to support a workable agreement which verifiably ensures that Iran would not be able to quickly amass material for nuclear weapons and would ensure that any such effort would be promptly detected and disrupted by the United States and the international community. A na�ve insistence on complete Iranian capitulation on enrichment will likely lead to the fracturing of the international sanctions regime, an unrestricted and unmonitored Iranian nuclear program, and yet another war in the Middle East.

We look forward to remaining in touch on this important issue.


  1. Americans for Peace Now
  2. Arms Control Association
  3. Brave New Films
  4. Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation
  5. Center for International Policy
  6. Church of the Brethren, Office of Public Witness
  8. Conference of Major Superiors of Men
  9. Council for a Livable World
  10. CREDO
  11. Daily Kos
  12. Evangelicals for Middle East Understanding
  13. Friends Committee on National Legislation
  14. Global Exchange
  15. Historians Against the War
  16. Institute for Policy Studies, New Internationalism Project
  17. International Civil Society Action Network
  18. J Street
  19. Just Foreign Policy
  20. MoveOn.org
  21. National Iranian American Council
  22. National Security Network
  23. Peace Action
  24. Peace Action West
  25. Physicians for Social Responsibility
  26. Progressive Democrats of America
  27. Roots Action
  28. Tikkun Magazine’s Interfaith Network of Spiritual Progressives
  29. United Church of Christ, Justice and Witness Ministries
  30. United for Peace and Justice
  31. United Methodist Church, General Board of Church and Society
  32. USAction
  33. U.S. Labor Against the War
  34. Vet Voice Foundation
  35. VoteVets
  36. Win Without War
  37. Women’s Action for New Directions